Автор Ассаджи, 12:25 24 декабря 2019
Цитата: chownahSo downloading the same stuff is legal in Switzerland and illegal in the USofA. So is the 2nd precept a matter of geography?
Цитата: steve19800I'm wondering how do you guys come to a conclusion?
Цитата: pilgrimLaws making downloading illegal are commercial laws, not precepts.
Цитата: pilgrimThese laws can be changed at any time.
Цитата: pilgrimMy precepts are not determined by officials in government.
Цитата: ZomThis is just a greed. I've been a musician for 10 years and had a band where we recorded an album. We payed a lot of money to make it. After release we sold CD's, of course, but many people just copied it and even uploaded to i-net so others could download and listen. And I tell you, we were alright with this, nobody had some kind of irritation or displeasure.
Цитата: ihrjordanis it possible to "steal" the Dhamma? Well according to BPS and those in favor of copyright it is somehow...
Цитата: ihrjordanAnd it's not possible that PTS was in the wrong here?
Цитата: ihrjordanWhat do they mean that they can't continue to study pali and the pali texts without proceeds?
Цитата: ihrjordanHow have they studied them the 2,000 years prior without copyright?
Цитата: ihrjordanI feel that if they were truly concerned with spreading the Dhamma as they say then they would have let it go.
Цитата: ihrjordanI completely support what these monks did, secular law does not and cannot determine what is moral and otherwise.
Цитата: ihrjordantwo things: 1. The "creator" of the idea isn't losing mastery or control over their idea as is the point of the second precept, it is only being copied.
Цитата: ihrjordan2. YOU CAN"T STEAL IMMATERIAL THINGS.
Цитата: Phenabut I can see Bhante you are getting caught up in the "laws of the land" aspect rather the ethical dimensions.
Цитата: PhenaLaws of the land are a often a shallow representation of ethics and indeed can run contrary to sound ethical positions. It's a poor yardstick.
Цитата: Sovatthika post_id=443588 time=1509954155 user_id=13883but worldly law is not dhammic law.
Цитата: Sovatthika post_id=443646 time=1509999965 user_id=13883it would be fitting then if i knew the origin of adinnaṃ like if it comes from a sutta, like did something happen for that to be lain down as a rule
ЦитироватьWhat has not been given: what has not been given, what has not been let go of, what has not been relinquished; what is guarded, what is protected, what is regarded as "mine;" what belongs to someone else. This is called "what has not been given."https://suttacentral.net/en/pi-tv-bu-vb-pj2
Цитата: Javi post_id=443756 time=1510072062 user_id=6355Doesn't this give too much moral authority to the state over and above the Buddha's Dhamma? Let's say that I lived in a totalitarian state whose laws made it clear that the state owns all intellectual property, including the words of the Buddha (not a far fetched premise, given several 20th century events). By this logic, even reciting or writing down from memory and distributing Dhamma without state permission would constitute as breaking the precept and one can easily see that the state would take this interpretation on board against monastics who sought to distribute Dhamma without state sanction.
ЦитироватьVinayaNow at that time King Seniya Bimbisāra of Magadha, desiring to postpone the rains, sent a messenger to the monks saying: "What if the masters could enter upon the rains at the next full-moon day?" They told this matter to the Lord. He said: "I allow you, monks, to obey kings."Buddhaghosa:I allow you, monks, to obey kings – here it is permitted for a bhikkhu to obey [the king] because delayed entry into the rains retreat causes no decline for bhikkhus; therefore in regard to any other kind of righteous act (dhammika kamma) a bhikkhu should obey, but never in regard to an unrighteous one.
Цитата: Ajir от 20:39 20 апреля 2022Здравствуйте. Задам несколько конкретных вопросов.Первая группа.Какими законами регулируется авторское право на научную и связанную литературу, изданную в советское время? В большинстве случаев "смерть автора плюс семьдесят лет" явно не прошли. С другой стороны, часто и современная, и советская научная литература размещается для скачивания на официальных научных сайтах.
Цитата: Ajir от 20:39 20 апреля 2022Конкретный вопрос, за который проститеhttps://dhamma.ru/canon/kn/dhp/dhammapada.htmДХАММАПАДАПриводится по изданию:«Дхаммапада»: Перевод с пали, введение и комментарии В.Н.Топорова.Памятники литературы народов Востока.Bibliotheca Buddhica XXXI.Издательство восточной литературы. – М., 1960.Если Топоров издал свой перевод в 1960, то даже не выясняя, когда он умер - 70 лет точно не прошли.Что делает распространение в интернете законным?Простите за вопрос, но скорее всего, Вы знаете ответ.